ChuckzBlog
Designed to inform, to encourage, to entertain and to stimulate your imaginations. Enjoy!

SCMP Taipei column -- Detour ahead?

Thursday, April 27, 2006
The things we "worry" about in Taiwan!
-- Chuck

Thursday, April 27, 2006
TAIPEI

Detour ahead?

BRADLEY WINTERTON

Taiwan's wonderful motorways are in the news. They are a pleasure to drive - especially when you stop for food and drink - but they may be under threat from a fast new train service.

Two virtually parallel highways run down the 450km length of the west coast, with service areas that, at their best, seem like resplendent works of art. In Britain 20 years ago, such places were dreary indeed. You lined up with your tray in a single cafeteria and paid high prices for what was often abysmal food, supplied by a single franchise holder. The very word "refreshments" could cause a shudder of grim apprehension.

Taiwan's are gorgeous emporia by comparison. Most have 20 or more different commercial outlets vying with each other to tempt the weary traveller, often with local cuisines. There are playgrounds for children, viewing platforms to survey the surrounding countryside, free maps, cherry trees and, in one instance, a birdwatching area. You speed southward, powered partly by your enthusiasm to see the next port of call.

Taiwanese can seem a bit muted in their reaction to this roadside grandeur. Some take it for granted: their children scamper from their parents' BMWs and run around the splendid, spacious halls as if at a birthday party. Others regard the ostentatious complexes with marked caution, possibly because the prices can be on the high side.

Even so, there is an unmistakable sense of pride in these motorways, service areas and food outlets. The island presents huge physical problems for road builders, with its 4,000-metre mountains, and valleys with boulder-strewn riverbeds up to 1-1/2 km wide. Only about 20 per cent of the land is flat. But Taiwan has used its prosperity to make the best use of every hectare of land. Japan has long been praised for doing the same with similar geographical conditions, and Taiwan deserves comparable acclaim.

The scene may be set to change, however. The driving time from Taipei to the popular resort of Kenting, on the island's southernmost tip, is some seven hours each way. That's slightly too long for a weekend trip, and the existing rail service isn't much faster. But a new, high-speed train is due to begin service soon, cutting the trip from Taipei to Kaohsiung to under two hours - leaving Kenting only a further 90 minutes by bus.

What will happen, then, to the motorways and their sumptuous service areas? Will they abolish their NT$40 ($9) tolls to lure back lost customers? Or will only long-distance truck drivers and short-haul travellers be left to appreciate their charms? The answer will be clear soon enough. The high-speed trains are due to begin operation in October.


Published in the South China Morning Post. Copyright © 2006. All rights reserved.

 
Thursday, April 27, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Go ahead and have that second cup of coffee -- or third, or fourth. A study published on Monday shows heavy, long-term coffee drinking does not raise the risk of heart disease for most people.
ADVERTISEMENT
The study, which followed 128,000 men and women for as long as 20 years, showed that drinking filtered coffee -- not espresso or French-style brews -- did not raise the risk of heart disease."


Posted by Picasa
Thursday, April 27, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


Tuesday, April 25, 2006
THINGS TO MAKE AND DO
(Some of which might be dangerous. So do them at your own risk)

Posted by Picasa
Tuesday, April 25, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


Can You Read This?

Saturday, April 22, 2006
Try to read this...very interesting.

i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
Saturday, April 22, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


Friday, April 21, 2006
Don't stare at this too long!

Posted by Picasa
Friday, April 21, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


Wednesday, April 19, 2006
Radiolovers.com - Free Old Time Radio Shows

"We offer hundreds of vintage radio shows for you to listen to online in mp3 format, all for free. Before the days of video games, shopping malls, MTV, and the Internet, families used to sit in their living room each night to listen to radio shows such as Abbott and Costello, Superman, Groucho Marx, The Avenger, Gunsmoke, Sherlock Homes, and many others. When TV become popular in the 1950's, most of these shows went off the air, but they now live on at websites such as this one and on weekly nostalgia radio broadcasts worldwide."


Posted by Picasa
Wednesday, April 19, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


Going through an "idenity crisis"? check this out... -- Chuck

Posted by Picasa
Wednesday, April 19, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


Mighty Optical Illusions

"This website will be all about optical illusions. I will post new illusions every now and then and make this website biggest and most quality collection on the net. Feel free to submit pictures you found on the net or took with your camera that somehow have that "optical illusion" atmosphere. Also don't hesitate to contact me with your ideas and proposals. I read all your mail, and it greatly impacts the way I'm thinking and improving this website dedicated to optical illusions, magic tricks, puzzles and paranormal activites..hmm... Over and out."


Posted by Picasa
Wednesday, April 19, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


'Trauma, drama princess' - Daily Devotional

 

April 18, 2006


'Trauma, drama princess'
by John Fischer

I have a daughter who fights with life. I guess I shouldn't be surprised. She was born eight weeks early and had to fight to get to where everyone else usually starts. Nothing's really changed since then. In school, she always insisted on going way beyond what was required, not because she had anything to prove, but because she couldn’t help it. She performs best in the most challenging of circumstances.

Her only flaw in this is that she always has to complain about the process all the time. Of course it doesn't hurt that she is also quite dramatic. There always seems to be some trauma that forces her to overcome a new difficulty, and while she is in the process of overcoming it, we have to continually hear how much better it would have been for her had the trauma not occurred. To which I always have to say, (or bite my tongue, waiting for the right opportunity to say) “but Anne, you wouldn't want it any other way.”

And she wouldn't. That's why I call her my “trauma, drama princess.” Any other way and she'd be bored to death. In school, the only classes she did not excel in were the easy ones that posed no challenge to her. This is also why she loves extreme sports: I am beginning to think she has to be in a near-death situation in order to induce normal blood flow to her brain.

Now why am I telling you this? Well, besides the joy of writing about my one-of-a-kind daughter, whom I delight in, there is a message here we all need to get. We cannot always control what happens to us, but we can control how we respond to what does.

My dear daughter has a tendency to burn a lot of energy turning the situation over and over in her mind. If such and such hadn't happened, then I wouldn't be here or there having to go through this or that. Life for her is pretty much variations on this theme - fill in the blanks. Sometimes I honestly think she is still trying to get those eight weeks back she lost in the womb.

But there's no point in going over what we can't do anything about. Focus on what we can control - our attitude as we live out our faith. As believers, we know that God has a purpose for our lives and for everything that happens to us. We're never going to change the past, but we can live in the knowledge that what was lost and found in the process of getting to where we are now has become a unique part of who we are and of what God has given us to do.

REMINDER: If for some reason you do not receive your devotional on any given day, you can go to our website, www.purposedrivenlife.com, to read the current day’s entry.


John Fischer is the Senior Writer for Purpose Driven Life Daily Devotionals. He resides in Southern California with his wife, Marti and son, Chandler. They also have two adult children, Christopher and Anne. John is a published author and popular speaker.

Click HERE for a free subscription to The Purpose Driven Life Daily Devotional, your daily inspiration via email.

Click HERE for a free subscription to The Better Life, your spiritual growth e-newsletter with articles by Rick Warren and others. To see a sample click HERE.

Click HERE for information on Mobile Devotionals sent to your cell phone
($3.99 a month).


 


Miss out on one of the Daily Devotionals? View the online archives at:
http://www.purposedrivenlife.com/devarchive.aspx

Have questions regarding the Daily Devotionals? Browse our Frequently Asked Questions at:
http://www.purposedrivenlife.com/absolutefm/afmtopics.asp

________________________________________

PurposeDrivenLife.com
a division of Purpose Driven Ministries
20 Empire Drive
Lake Forest, CA 92630
________________________________________

Wednesday, April 19, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


Bothered by the Cross - Easter Special Issue - SojoMail 04.17.06

Tuesday, April 18, 2006


SPECIAL ISSUE: Bothered by the Cross       04.17.2006  www.sojo.net


ADVERTISEMENT

Help protect suffering children!

The freedom to practice one's own religion. The right not to be hungry or cold. Protection from abduction, abuse, exploitation, and neglect. The right to live. Every child deserves these fundamental protections - everywhere and always.

Click here - join the voices to protect children!

The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child protects the basic rights of children and has been ratified by 192 countries - all but Somalia and the United States. Sign the petition to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and urge United States to join the rest of the world and protect the basic rights of every child!

P.S. Please spread the word to friends and urge them to speak out for suffering children!


  THEOLOGICALLY CONNECT ^top  

Bothered by the cross
by Deanna Murshed

As someone who has been a Christian for a while now, I must confess that the idea of redemption through the cross has lost its power to bother or puzzle me as it did in the past.

I remember being jealous of folks who could confess a grand conversion experience that pulled them from lives of sheer drunken hedonistic debauchery - dramatic stories in which they were saved just in the nick of time - into resurrection just by the skin of their teeth. And although getting in by the skin of our teeth is surely true for all of us, it is at least more obvious in those great stories, for whatever reason.

But that is not my story.

Even my earliest memories include my mother sharing Bible stories with me. Though I struggled with the meaning or reality of these accounts to be sure - I can't recall a time when I didn't perceive myself within this grand story of redemption.

My mother showed me a simple faith. My father, on the other hand, questioned just about everything. And I somehow inherited both. God help those who hear me think out loud.

I also remember that as a child, the idea that Christ died on the cross and rose again for me - though it was repeated over and over again and I so desperately wanted to believe it made sense - seemed odd. But I think it was repeated often enough, that eventually, I just came to accept it. After all, the answer to almost any question in Sunday school was easy: "because Jesus died on the cross!"

So, somewhere along the road, I took it for granted that Christ lived, died, and rose again. Somewhere, maybe after I had responded to the sixth altar call - just to make sure God had duly noted my belief - I had heard it enough times to think I had this mystery of mysteries settled.

But every now and then, I come back to that place. Really, what in the world does this mean? Christ died on the cross. It is so easy to hear now that the absolute foolishness of it - and I mean that in the best possible way - simply ceases to amaze me.

But liturgical cycles are good for that - making you not forget any part of the story and asking you to revisit each station, as it were. One passage has been coming to mind (from John's gospel):

"Jesus replied, 'The hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified. Very truly, I tell you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains just a single grain; but if it dies, it bears much fruit. Those who love their life lose it, and those who hate their life in this world will keep it for eternal life'" (12:23-25).

The version of the Bible called The Message states the last verse this way: "In the same way, anyone who holds on to life just as it is destroys that life. But if you let it go, reckless in your love, you'll have it forever, real and eternal."

The part that really struck me recently (though I've surely heard it read a hundred times) is that the dying of the grain is not for the resurrection of the seed itself - you do not die simply to be resurrected into a better you. You don't give up that bad habit or attitude, greed or grudge, simply to come out on top. (Though I suppose that's not a bad place to begin). No, the grain dies so that it can produce and reproduce life. The passage says, unless a seed falls to the ground and dies it is no more than a single grain.

The answer as to why the grain needs to die is for it not to remain alone. In other words, Christ died so that he could bear more Christs and grow his reign!

Though this way of living for others seems like such a radical (re)orientation, all of creation seems to be screaming this message. Every part of the wheat is living for the spread of life, wants there to be more wheat. The most basic cycle of nature reflects the divine order.

It is simply astounding, when I think about it, that the God of creation does not live for direct self-satisfaction! The God of creation who has all power and all might is in constant submission to another purpose. And God is inviting us to follow.

When one reads the surrounding texts in John where Christ is trying to explain to his disciples who he is and why he must leave them, he is rather indirect. He never says, I do such and such because that is my plan. Rather, he points to the Father and then says that the Father points to the Son and has given Him authority. And then the Spirit testifies of the Son and so on and on. And then the Father lifts up the Son. It is almost comedic how each part of the trinity points the finger at the other - not in blame, as in the human tendency - but because of a perfect harmony, submission, and a trade of trust and authority between each member. This is a wholly different order - a glimpse of what divine community looks like.

I don't know about you, but completely surrendering my will for another goes against every grain of my self-preserving being. And it looks nothing whatsoever like our capitalist culture which encourages us to think the opposite - both economically and morally. The world says that if each individual seeks out his or her own personal fulfillment, we will all ultimately benefit. But the gospel compels us to seek the benefit of others with no guarantee of anything in return.

This is a terrifying invitation that should bother us.

But do our motives have to be absolutely perfect in the sight of God before we can follow? And can we ever reach the point of being perfectly other-oriented? (If so, I'm in trouble).

But I'm comforted that in scripture, I find myself in good company. Christ's disciples followed him for many reasons - not all of which were noble. Ironically, sometimes they were selfish in their pursuit of selflessness. Sometimes they sought to gain something (to meet earthly or eternal needs), other times because they knew there was no other way. Later, they figured a few things out - saw Christ more fully - and their motives changed to those of gratitude, and ultimately, they imitated Christ's example to obey simply because God is worthy.

So, I've come to believe that we hold on to this mysterious truth for different reasons at different times in our lives, though we may never come to fully understand how it is that Christ's death saves us.

That we should follow Jesus in his death so that we might really live is the message of this Easter season.

May God have mercy on us as we follow this call.

Deanna Murshed, integrated marketing manager at Sojourners, is a graduate of Trinity Evangelical Divinity School's faith and culture program.

+ Share this issue with your friends


ADVERTISEMENT

Help protect suffering children!

The freedom to practice one's own religion. The right not to be hungry or cold. Protection from abduction, abuse, exploitation, and neglect. The right to live. Every child deserves these fundamental protections - everywhere and always.

Click here - join the voices to protect children!

The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child protects the basic rights of children and has been ratified by 192 countries - all but Somalia and the United States. Sign the petition to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and urge United States to join the rest of the world and protect the basic rights of every child!

P.S. Please spread the word to friends and urge them to speak out for suffering children!


GIVE TO SOJOURNERS
Donate now to support this voice for justice and peace.

CONTACT US

Letters to the editor: www.sojo.net/sojomail/boomerang
General inquiries: sojourners@sojo.net
Advertising: advertising@sojo.net

PRIVACY NOTICE
Sojourners won't trade, sell, or give away your e-mail address. Read our privacy policy.

OPTIONS

Subscribe | Tell-a-Friend | Browse Archives | Search Archives | About Us| Unsubscribe

 
Tuesday, April 18, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


US-CERT Cyber Security Alert -- Mozilla Products Contain Multiple Vulnerabilities

National Cyber Alert System

Cyber Security Alert SA06-107A

Mozilla Products Contain Multiple Vulnerabilities

Original release date: April 17, 2006
Last revised: --
Source: US-CERT

Systems Affected

* Mozilla web browser
* Mozilla email application
* Firefox web browser
* Thunderbird email application
* Mozilla Suite

Overview

By taking advantage of one or more vulnerabilities in Mozilla
products, an attacker may be able to take control of your computer.

Solution

Upgrade to the latest versions of Firefox and Thunderbird

Mozilla has released an updated version of Firefox to correct these
problems.

Mozilla has released an updated version of the Thunderbird email
program to correct these problems.

Description

There are vulnerabilities in various features of the Mozilla web
browser, Mozilla email application, Firefox web browser, and
Thunderbird email application. Some of the vulnerabilities involve
the way these applications handle URLs or images. For instance, an
attacker could cause an application to crash or could take control
of your computer by convincing you to view a malicious web site or
email message.

For more technical information, see US-CERT Technical Alert
TA06-107A.

References

* Mozilla Foundation Security Advisories -
<http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/>

* US-CERT Technical Cyber Security Alert TA06-107A -
<http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA06-107A.html>

* US-CERT Vulnerability Notes Related to April Mozilla Security
Advisories -
<http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/byid?searchview&query=mozilla_April_2
006>

* US-CERT Vulnerability Note VU#932734 -
<http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/932734>

* US-CERT Vulnerability Note VU#968814 -
<http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/968814>

* US-CERT Vulnerability Note VU#179014 -
<http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/179014>

* US-CERT Vulnerability Note VU#488774 -
<http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/488774>

* US-CERT Vulnerability Note VU#842094 -
<http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/842094>

* US-CERT Vulnerability Note VU#813230 -
<http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/813230>

* US-CERT Vulnerability Note VU#736934 -
<http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/736934>

* US-CERT Vulnerability Note VU#935556 -
<http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/935556>

* US-CERT Vulnerability Note VU#350262 -
<http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/350262>

* US-CERT Vulnerability Note VU#252324 -
<http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/252324>

* US-CERT Vulnerability Note VU#329500 -
<http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/329500>

* Firefox - Rediscover the Web - <http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/>
* Thunderbird - Reclaim your inbox -
<http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird/>

* Mozilla Suite - The All-in-One Internet Application Suite -
<http://www.mozilla.org/products/mozilla1.x/>

* Securing Your Web Browser -
<http://www.us-cert.gov/reading_room/securing_browser/browser_secu
rity.html#Mozilla_Firefox>

____________________________________________________________________

The most recent version of this document can be found at:

<http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/alerts/SA06-107A.html>
____________________________________________________________________

Feedback can be directed to US-CERT. Please send email to
<cert@cert.org> with "SA06-107A Feedback VU#968814" in the subject.
____________________________________________________________________

Mailing list information:

<http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/>
____________________________________________________________________

Produced 2006 by US-CERT, a government organization.

Terms of use:

<http://www.us-cert.gov/legal.html>
____________________________________________________________________

Revision History

April 17, 2006: Initial release

Tuesday, April 18, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


This Day takes us back to reality

Sunday, April 16, 2006
 
The Holiday Hallmark Can't Handle
04/14/06


Every year on Good Friday, I notice a peculiar feeling. When I’m out and about, riding the bus or walking past a store, I feel a strange disconnect between myself and the world around me.

In This Article...
A Sense of Loss
Impossible to Adapt
An Enduring Sign

A Sense of Loss

Outside, it’s an ordinary day. The streets are busy, people are buying and selling, there are families in the parks and planes in the air. It’s springtime in Atlanta, and already the earth’s beauty is beginning to be seen.

Inside, things are different. I feel a sense of loss, a sense of a great drama taking place. This is the day on which we commemorate the Crucifixion of Jesus. I cannot help thinking about it, at least from time to time. In the evening, my wife and I will go to church for a Tenebrae service, somber and sometimes even harsh. When it’s over, the worshipers will leave in silence, totally unlike any other service of the year.

My awareness of Good Friday makes the very ordinariness of the city and the suburbs seem bizarre, remote, almost unreal. I have my mind on profound and solemn things; to some extent I am even mourning with Jesus’ first disciples. The world around me takes no notice, utterly none. And that is as it should be.

Impossible to Adapt

Good Friday is the one Christian “holiday” that the wider culture, even in America, has not taken up. It is the one holy day whose Christian significance cannot be bleached out to leave a commercially viable residue. Christmas can be for children and families, for shopping, for feasting. Easter can be bunnies and baby chicks, the newness of spring and a whole lot of chocolate. Even a couple of days marked out to honor saints in some Christian traditions — Valentine, Patrick — have been pretty much entirely taken over by a culture of romance and hedonism, sex and shopping.

Not this day. There is nothing marketable about Good Friday. Suffering, sacrifice, injustice, betrayal — what’s to celebrate? What’s to shop for? Who could pig out on a day like that?

The absolute impossibility of adapting Good Friday to consumer culture is most evident in the fact that even the greeting-card industry, which seems capable of churning out more or less appropriate little notes for every conceivable religious event and life occasion, has nothing for today. Can you imagine it?

Because He bled and died,
We’re all choked up inside.
It’s not a lovely day,
But I still hope you’re okay.

Wishing you and yours a joyless, grave,
and yet oddly hopeful Good Friday.
There is simply no way for a culture devoted to lightweight enjoyment and superficial relationships to come to terms with Good Friday. It is, in a sense, the last bulwark of genuine Christian spirituality against the sea of pop religion that has overwhelmed the American churches. This is our day. Madison Avenue, Hollywood, and Nashville can’t take it away from us because they have no idea what to do with it.

Yet this day represents the central mystery in the religion that many want to claim as America’s own. Not only did God become a mortal man, Christianity maintains, but He went all the way through with it, “even unto death.” And not just any death: the Son of God died unjustly at the hands of a worldwide empire that used every means at its disposal to suppress insurgents. A death by torture, a death of shame, a death of horror.

Nor was it solely that, we claim, one more crucifixion among so many hundreds. We say God took on this death in order to give the world life. We say God knew suffering and tragedy so that we might never more feel that we suffer alone. We say God washed away our sins in the blood of Him Who was God made flesh.

An Enduring Sign

There is no greeting card, no trinket, no wrapping paper to celebrate that. Here grief and giving, loss and love, sorrow and salvation mingle in a way that calls forth the most penetrating efforts of human art and intellect to portray and understand. Here is a mystery that is profound beyond cheapening, beyond compromising. It is our day, beyond any culture’s ability to absorb and control.

Good Friday is an enduring sign of Christianity’s maladjustment to the world. Jesus died as the ultimate outsider to power, success, honor, and prosperity. Every time we try to make our religion somehow compatible with those values — that is to say, every day we live this human life — the Cross of Good Friday will stand, in its solemnity, its poverty, and its grief, as the final roadblock to our desire to be conformed.

Good Friday also keeps us mindful of the ultimately paradoxical nature of Christian faith. This day of betrayal and death and grief commemorates what we believe to be our source of life and joy. Day-to-day culture thrives on simple explanations, straightforward accounts. Jesus’ claim that “whoever loses his life will save it” (Mk 8:35) makes no sense in that culture, and Good Friday is a lasting rebuke to our desire to dumb down God’s ways to the level of our security and comfort.

Good Friday keeps me honest in the world. It’s a day when I can’t simply be an American consumer, when I can’t just walk down the street and be one of the oblivious crowd, busy but satisfied with my own goals and values. It points me toward another reality, a painful yet life-giving reality, the reality of God. It wakes me up. It reminds me that if I, like the Apostle Paul, am “always carrying Jesus’ dying around in my body” (2 Cor 4:10), then there must be something of Good Friday in every day.


David Rensberger is Professor of New Testament at the Interdenominational Theological Center in Atlanta, Georgia.

Sunday, April 16, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


"Behold, the Lamb"

Saturday, April 15, 2006
 
“Behold, the Lamb!”-
-by Maxine Fream
 
Artists attempting to illustrate
       the agony of Christ in the Garden,
Are more adept at illustrating
      the garden than the agony;
Posing Christ pristinely
      Kneeling by a convenient ledge,
Robes arranged in careful folds,
      Perma-pressed, unmarred
By sweat or soil from washing
      Twelve pair of dirty feet.
 
The Gospels say He fell on His face
      Upon the ground.  This Son of God
Through whom all things were made,
      Humbled to earth as earthly creature,
Flung Himself upon the warm earth
      As a child on His mother’s bosom,
On that dark night of His soul,
      Mingling His tears
With the night dew, and moaning low,
       “Let this cup pass.”
 
Was He afraid to die?  Not God then,
     But only man,
Fearful of what lesser men
     Have dared to do unflinchingly?
How could it be?  He made no moan
     When cold iron pierced His flesh.
Not nails, nor wood, nor thorns, nor blood
     Could cause His soul to cringe.
What was it then that wrung such cries
     From the Savior’s anguished lips?
 
Ah! There’s the word – the Savior!
     He must save the world from its sins.
The travail was not in the fact of His death,
     Nor the how of His death, but the why!
The sinless must die for the sinful,
     And dying, bear the blame.
“The Lord hath laid upon him the iniquity of us all.”
 
How in all eternity
     Can we ever understand
With our tarnished hands and sooty souls
     The horror sin holds for the pure?
Though guilty ourselves
     We do not easily bear
Reproach for another’s wrongs.
     How then can the One whom seraphim
Perpetually acknowledge as holy
     Bear all the sin for all the world?
 
It is a thing almost impossible
     For even God to do;
And even then it is not God as God
     But God as Man who dies.
The sins of all the world - - -
     What appalling visions pass
Before the mind’s eye of this One
     From whom no thoughts are hid;
This One who is at all times present,
     And said of Himself, “I AM.”
 
Lies, lies, from the father of lies,
     Antithesis of Truth Incarnate:
Abraham saying to Pharaoh, half-truthfully,
     “She is my sister.”
Jacob before Isaac, kneeling,
     “I am Esau, your first-born.”
Joseph’s brothers with his bloodied coat
     Proclaiming, “This we have found.”
Peter, profane in the courtyard, swearing,
     “I never knew Him.”
 
How many lies have come twisting, tearing
     And howling down the ages?
How many times must we square the number
     Before we come to mine?
“My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death.”
 
Those images fade, but others
     Viler yet, must come.
Israel’s judge, betraying his weakness,
     His head in a harlot’s lap;
Israel’s king seducing a woman,
     The only wife of another;
Drunken Lot betrayed by his daughters,
     Sodom born and bred;
A wise king become a fool
     In lust for a thousand women.
 
Promiscuous women, forsaking their virtue
     To embrace perverted desire:
From Dinah, Tamar, and Rahab
     To the woman at Jacob’s well;
The unwelcome harlot at Simon’s feast
     And the woman taken in adultery;
Every evil imagination of the heart
     Laid upon the one pure Man
Who ever honored womanhood.
“And His sweat became like great drops
     Of blood falling down upon the ground.”
 
Still the horror is not finished;
     The violent are yet to come:
Moses, David, Paul – all of them
     Bearing blood-stained hands.
Violence, strife, and murder
     And the innocent lie dying
Singly or by millions and the blood
     Flows through the streets
Sixteen hundred furlongs
     Up to the horses’ bridles.
 
“Behold, the day of the Lord comes cruel,
     With wrath and fierce anger,
To make the earth a desolation
     And to destroy its sinners from it.”
“I will punish the world for its evil,
     And the wicked for their iniquity.”
“Fill the cup with the wrath of God
     And let the guilty drink it.”
 
The prone form stirs, the eyes uplift;
     The agony has peaked,
Has worked its awesome worst and failed;
     Submission is achieved:
“My Father, if this cup
     Cannot pass unless I drink it,
Thy will –Thy will be done.”
     “Behold, the Lamb!”

=======================
Maxine Fream Gash
164 Friendship Circle
Joplin, MO  64801
417-624-6914
Saturday, April 15, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


[Chuckz Blog] 4/14/2006 01:42:41 PM

Friday, April 14, 2006
Posted by Chuck to Chuckz Blog at 4/14/2006 01:42:41 PM
 
 Something to keep in mind while you hear and read about the "gospel" of Judas  (taken from the NG article):  
 
"Around A.D. 180, Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyon in what was then Roman Gaul, wrote a massive treatise called Against Heresies. The book was a ?erce denunciation of all those whose views about Jesus and his message differed from those of the mainstream church. Among those he attacked was a group who revered Judas,  "the traitor, and had produced a  "fictitious history, which  "they style the Gospel of Judas.  
 
The fact the the "gospel" of Judas was around and known to the Church Fathers does not mean that it told the truth or was historically accurate. It was written nearly 200 years after the Gospel of John by a sect with an "ax to grind" philosophically and theologically—the Gnostics. They denied the unique identity of Jesus as the Son of God and claimed that all men could become like Him through "enlightenment". Of course it made sense to try and explain Jesus' death on the cross as an "accident", a plan between Judas and Jesus that went horribly wrong. 
Give me a break!
Chuck
 

Posted by Picasa

--
Posted by Chuck to Chuckz Blog at 4/14/2006 01:42:41 PM
Friday, April 14, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


With more than 475,000 human-edited entries, Acronym Finder is the world's largest and most comprehensive database of acronyms, abbreviations, and initialisms. Combined with the Acronym Attic , Acronym Finder contains more than 3 million acronyms and abbreviations. You can search or filter terms from the [many] categories....


Posted by Picasa
Friday, April 14, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


Something to keep in mind while you hear and read about the "gospel" of Judas --------- Around A.D. 180, Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyon in what was then Roman Gaul, wrote a massive treatise called Against Heresies. The book was a ?erce denunciation of all those whose views about Jesus and his message differed from those of the mainstream church. Among those he attacked was a group who revered Judas, �the traitor,� and had produced a �?ctitious history,� which �they style the Gospel of Judas.�


Posted by Picasa
Friday, April 14, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


Bloglines - The Judas Gospel @ National Geographic magazine

Bloglines user ChuckzBlog (chuckzmail@johnstonz.net) has sent this item to you.


Clayblog
An ongoing discussion of what the Bible says about this, that, and the other thing. Plus, movies and culture, and the random oddities of life.

The Judas Gospel @ National Geographic magazine

By jc

http://www9.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/gospel/

The story by National Geographic that was mentioned in the last post.

jc

Link

Friday, April 14, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


Bloglines - The Gospel of Judas: Fact or Fiction? - CWN

Bloglines user ChuckzBlog (chuckzmail@johnstonz.net) has sent this item to you.


Clayblog
An ongoing discussion of what the Bible says about this, that, and the other thing. Plus, movies and culture, and the random oddities of life.
Friday, April 14, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


"Normally, this media of broadcast mail to the users of the Neat Net Tricks Bulletin Board is reserved for error correction, dead links, and other such humdrum stuff.

But, just for a change of pace, I thought you might like to know:

I've been mesmerized, as has 2 million site visitors per day and 5,000 connected at any one time, at a pair of eagles keeping their two eggs warm in a nest of Hornsby Island, British Columbia. The live video cam is at http://www.infotecbusinesssystems.com/wildlife/default.asp and we've watched them through rain and high winds as well as hot sun..... Amazing what parents (or soon-to-be parents) will go through for their kids!

Now, why didn't I include this item in Neat Net Tricks? It's merely a matter of timing. The eggs will hatch before the next issue does."

Enjoy!

Jack
jteems@neatnettricks.com

Posted by Picasa
Friday, April 14, 2006 :: ::

Chuck :: permalink


Does Globalization Help or Hurt the World's Poor?

 
 
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&articleID=0004B7FD-C4E6-1421-84E683414B7F0101&pageNumber=1&catID=2
Does Globalization Help or Hurt the World's Poor?
By Pranab Bardhan
  
Science Image
Image: JEAN-FRANCOIS PODEVIN
 
Globalization and the attendant concerns about poverty and inequality have become a focus of discussion in a way that few other topics, except for international terrorism or global warming, have. Most people I know have a strong opinion on globalization, and all of them express an interest in the well-being of the world's poor. The financial press and influential international officials confidently assert that global free markets expand the horizons for the poor, whereas activist-protesters hold the opposite belief with equal intensity. Yet the strength of people's conviction is often in inverse proportion to the amount of robust factual evidence they have.

As is common in contentious public debates, different people mean different things by the same word. Some interpret "globalization" to mean the global reach of communications technology and capital movements, some think of the outsourcing by domestic companies in rich countries, and others see globalization as a byword for corporate capitalism or American cultural and economic hegemony. So it is best to be clear at the outset of this article that I shall primarily refer to economic globalization--the expansion of foreign trade and investment. How does this process affect the wages, incomes and access to resources for the poorest people in the world? This question is one of the most important in social science today.

 
For a quarter century after World War II, most developing countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America insulated their economies from the rest of the world. Since then, though, most have opened their markets. For instance, between 1980 and 2000, trade in goods and services expanded from 23 to 46 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in China and from 19 to 30 percent in India. Such changes have caused many hardships for the poor in developing countries but have also created opportunities that some nations utilize and others do not, largely depending on their domestic political and economic institutions. (The same is true for low-wage workers in the U.S., although the effects of globalization on rich countries are beyond the scope of this article.) The net outcome is often quite complex and almost always context-dependent, belying the glib pronouncements for or against globalization made in the opposing camps. Understanding the complexities is essential to taking effective action.

Neither Plague nor Panacea
The case for free trade rests on the age-old principle of comparative advantage, the idea that countries are better off when they export the things they are best at producing, and import the rest. Most mainstream economists accept the principle, but even they have serious differences of opinion on the balance of potential benefits and actual costs from trade and on the importance of social protection for the poor. Free traders believe that the rising tide of international specialization and investment lifts all boats. Others point out that many poor people lack the capacity to adjust, retool and relocate with changing market conditions. These scholars argue that the benefits of specialization materialize in the long run, over which people and resources are assumed to be fully mobile, whereas the adjustments can cause pain in the short run.

The debate among economists is a paragon of civility compared withthe one taking place in the streets. Antiglobalizers' central claim is that globalization is making the rich richer and the poor poorer; proglobalizers assert that it actually helps the poor. But if one looks at the factual evidence, the matter is rather more complicated. On the basis of household survey data collected by different agencies, the World Bank estimates the fraction of the population in developing countries that falls below the $1-a-day poverty line (at 1993 prices)--an admittedly crude but internationally comparable level. By this measure, extreme poverty is declining in the aggregate.

The trend is particularly pronounced in East, South and Southeast Asia. Poverty has declined sharply in China, India and Indonesia--countries that have long been characterized by massive rural poverty and that together account for about half the total population of develop­-ing countries. Between 1981 and 2001 the percentage of rural people living on less than $1 a day decreased from 79 to 27 percent in China, 63 to 42 percent in India, and 55 to 11 percent in Indonesia.

 

But although the poorest are not, on the whole, getting poorer, no one has yet convincingly demonstrated that improvements in their condition are mainly the result of globalization. In China the poverty trend could instead be attributed to internal factors such as the expansion of infrastructure, the massive 1978 land reforms (in which the Mao-era communes were disbanded), changes in grain procurement prices, and the relaxation of restrictions on rural-to-urban migration. In fact, a substantial part of the decline in poverty had already happened by the mid-1980s, before the big strides in foreign trade or investment. Of the more than 400 million Chinese lifted above the international poverty line between 1981 and 2001, three fourths got there by 1987.

 

The sharp decline in extreme poverty in China may have more to do with the 1978 land reforms and other internal factors than with foreign trade or investment.

Similarly, rural poverty reduction in India may be attributable to the spread of the Green Revolution in agriculture, government antipoverty programs and social movements--not the trade liberalization of the 1990s. In Indonesia the Green Revolution, macroeconomic policies, stabilization of rice prices and massive investment in rural infrastructure played a substantial role in the large reduction of rural poverty. Of course, globalization, by expanding employment in labor-intensive manufacturing, has helped to pull many Chinese and Indonesians out of poverty since the mid-1980s (though not yet as much in India, for various domestic institutional and policy reasons). But it is only one factor among many accounting for the economic advances of the past 25 years.

Those who are dubious of the benefits of globalization point out that poverty has remained stubbornly high in sub-­Saharan Africa. Between 1981 and 2001 the fraction of Africans living below the international poverty line increased from 42 to 47 percent. But this deterioration appears to have less to do with globalization than with unstable or failed political regimes. If anything, such instability reduced their extent of globalization, as it scared off many foreign investors and traders. Volatile politics amplifies longer-term factors such as geographic isolation, disease, overdependence on a small number of export products, and the slow spread of the Green Revolution [see "Can Extreme Poverty Be Eliminated?" by Jeffrey D. Sachs; Scientific American, September 2005].

Science Image: Rice field
Rice field,  Jiangxi Province, China, early 1990s
Sweatshops
Global market competition in general rewards people with initiative, skills, information and entrepreneurship in all countries. Poor people everywhere are handicapped by their lack of access to capital and opportunities to learn new skills. Workers in some developing countries--say, Mexico--are losing their jobs in labor-intensive manufacturing to their counterparts in Asia. At the same time, foreign investment has also brought new jobs. Overall, the effect appears to be a net improvement. In Mexico, low-wage poverty is declining in the regions that are more involved in the international economy than others--even controlling for the fact that skilled and enterprising people migrate to those regions, improving incomes there independently of what globalization accomplishes. A recent study by Gordon H. Hanson of the University of California, San Diego, which took into account only people born in a particular region (thus leaving out migrants), found that during the 1990s average incomes in the Mexican states most affected by globalization increased 10 percent more than those least affected.

In poor Asian economies, such as Bangladesh, Vietnam and Cambodia, large numbers of women now have work in garment export factories. Their wages are low by world standards but much higher than they would earn in alternative occupations. Advocates who worry about exploitative sweatshops have to appreciate the relative improvement in these women's conditions and status. An Oxfam report in 2002 quoted Rahana Chaudhuri, a 23-year-old mother working in the garment industry in Bangladesh:

 

This job is hard--and we are not treated fairly. The managers do not respect us women. But life is much harder for those working outside. Back in my village, I would have less money. Outside of the factories, people selling things in the street or carrying bricks on building sites earn less than we do. There are few other options. Of course, I want better conditions. But for me this job means that my children will have enough to eat and that their lives can improve.

In 2001 Naila Kabeer of the University of Sussex in England and Simeen Mahmud of the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies did a survey of 1,322 women workers in Dhaka. They discovered that the average monthly income of workers in garment-export factories was 86 percent above that of other wage workers living in the same slum neighborhoods.

 
Another indication of this relative improvement can be gauged by what happens when such opportunities disappear. In 1993, anticipating a U.S. ban on imports of products made using child labor, the garment industry in Bangladesh dismissed an estimated 50,000 children. UNICEF and local aid groups investigated what happened to them. About 10,000 children went back to school, but the rest ended up in much inferior occupations, including stone breaking and child prostitution. That does not excuse the appalling working conditions in the sweatshops, let alone the cases of forced or unsafe labor, but advocates must recognize the severely limited existing opportunities for the poor and the possible unintended consequences of "fair trade" policies.

The Local Roots of Poverty
Integration into the international economy brings not only opportunities but also problems. Even when new jobs are better than the old ones, the transition can be wrenching. Most poor countries provide very little effective social protection to help people who have lost their jobs and not yet found new ones. Moreover, vast numbers of the poor work on their own small farms or for household enterprises. The major constraints they usually face are domestic, such as lack of access to credit, poor infrastructure, venal government officials and insecure land rights. Weak states, unaccountable regimes, lopsided wealth distribution, and inept or corrupt politicians